When It Is Used
Use it after an AAC approach is already in use and the team needs to understand adoption, satisfaction, use across environments, or reduced-use risk.
AAC Outcome / Abandonment Risk Review is a follow-up tool for AAC practitioners and teams. It helps review adoption, use, satisfaction, cross-environment fit, and descriptive risk that an AAC approach may be reduced or abandoned, then document recommended changes to sustain use.
Interested in using AAC Outcome / Abandonment Risk Review with clients? Request access now.
Request access to AAC Outcome / Abandonment Risk Review. Enter your email below.
Use this background section to understand when the tool fits, how practitioners use it, and what to consider before sharing it with clients.
Use it after an AAC approach is already in use and the team needs to understand adoption, satisfaction, use across environments, or reduced-use risk.
The review captures environments, stakeholder perspectives, use patterns, satisfaction concerns, breakdowns, descriptive risk indicators, recommended changes, and review history.
The tool does not calculate abandonment-risk scores, assign blame, generate automatic recommendations, or make funding determinations.
No. It identifies risk indicators descriptively and leaves recommended changes to the practitioner.
Yes. If the AAC system is not being used in an environment, non-use should be recorded as the use pattern.
Both reports remain visible with their source so the practitioner can interpret the difference.
Yes. Historical reviews support monitoring whether changes sustain AAC use as contexts or preferences change.