Formal Review Context
The tool is narrower than a general skills checklist and is intended for research, training, supervision, or quality review contexts where implementation integrity matters.
CCPT Research Integrity / Fidelity Checklist
The CCPT Research Integrity / Fidelity Checklist is a practitioner- and reviewer-only tool for research, training, supervision, or quality review contexts. It helps reviewers record observable implementation evidence and produce an integrity profile showing configured model elements, deviations, drift, inconsistency, and insufficient-evidence areas.
Explore the integrity review
Interested in using CCPT Research Integrity / Fidelity Checklist with clients? Request access now.
Request access
Request access to CCPT Research Integrity / Fidelity Checklist. Enter your email below.
Tool guide
Learn more about this tool
Use this background section to understand when the tool fits, how practitioners use it, and what to consider before sharing it with clients.
Evidence Standards
Judgments must be grounded in observable implementation evidence or marked insufficient evidence. Insufficient evidence is distinct from non-adherence.
Does the checklist decide whether a study or practitioner is valid?
No. The tool does not make automatic validity conclusions, pass/fail decisions, or unsupported competence judgments.
Can incomplete reviews support integrity conclusions?
No. Incomplete reviews are marked incomplete and cannot support defensible integrity conclusions on their own.
Does the tool invent required model elements?
No. Required elements, deviations, response options, and thresholds must come from configured checklist content.
Can integrity reviews be compared over time?
Yes, but direct comparison requires matching checklist structure and response rules.